Rampart
around (and gates into) Middle Saxon Ipswich
As with so many features of the long
history of Ipswich (and elsewhere), it is sometimes difficult to
untangle changes over time. One question people ask is: what was the
route of the rampart around the ancient town centre? Also, where were
the gates in the defences allowing access to Ipswich?
Speed's map of 1610 John Speed's
map, described and filleted on this website, shows hatching around
the northern perimeter of the old town, but what happens to the east
and west?
October 2021: John Norman has had sight of a collection of cuttings
which belonged to
Edward Grimwade (1812-1886): clothier, Congregationalist and thrice
mayor of Ipswich. Amongst the papers he received was a book, a very
limited edition The Memorials of
Edward Grimwade which is a reprint of the obituaries that
appeared, following his death/funeral/memorial services in local
newspapers and national journals (e.g. The Christian World). The East Anglian Daily Times (EADT) article fills 21 pages of the
140 page book. (Grimwade Memorial Hall in Fore Hamlet was erected in
his memory).
A cutting from the local press (probably the EADT) from Griwade's collection has
great
interest to the matter in hand. The transcription here follows all the
original punctuation (lots of commas), but reformats the article and
adds headings for ease of digestion. Because of the mention of 'making
a trench a few days since for sanitary purposes', we can date the
article to the digging of the Victorian sewers in in Ipswich (1881-2)
which were designed by engineer Peter Schuyler Bruff, who contibuted so
much to the town where he made his home in Handford Lodge – notably the
extension of the railway from Stoke and the building of Stoke Hill
tunnel.
'ANCIENT IPSWICH AND THE OLD
TOWN WALL. Traces of the old
North Gate? As some workmen were making a trench
a few days since for sanitary purposes in the open space at the top of
Northgate Street, they came upon an old foundation of concrete,which
may be that of the old North Gate, or that of the old wall, which,
prior to the tenth century, surrounded the town, which at that very
early period could not have been very extensive.
The route of the
rampart and the gates into the town
In referring to Speed’s map of 1610, the
old North Gate stood upon the spot named above, but as the excavations
are not deep nor extensive, much doubt may exist as to which the
masonry belonged. In tracing the old wall mentioned by Speed , it
appears to have gone along the old Tower Ramparts to Bull Gate, and
then to the “Barre” Gate, or West Gate, which crossed St Matthew’s
Street (this was made a gaol in Henry VI’s time; it was standing in
1769).
It then went down Lady Lane, Tanner’s
Lane, and slightly bending, went down Friars’ Road, between the
Monastery of Grey Friars and St Nicholas’ Church to the river. From the
North Gate easterly it went down Old Foundry Road, Upper Orwell and
Lower Orwell Streets. Upon this last route were evidently two other
Gates, East Gate and South Gate.
There is little doubt but that the
town was strongly fortified by a wall, a fosse or ditch, and earthen
rampart, or Vallum. These strong defences, though, could not stand
against the Danes, who pillaged the town twice in ten years, from 990
to 1000, but in the reign of King John the fortifications were
repaired.
The Letes in the
town
• The Gates of the town gave names to the Letes or
Wards, such as the following:–
• The East Gate Lete, reached from North Gate, by
Archdeacon’s House to the stone cross in Brook Street, called St
Lewis’s cross, so down Tankard Street to Friars’ Preachers’ Wall, with
Carr Street, St. Margaret’s Green (then called Thingstead), and the
lane leading to Little Bolton, and Caldwell or St. Helen’s Street;
• West Gate Lete from North Gate, by Archdeacon’s
House to the corner leading to Brook Street and the fish market, and so
on to the Cornhill and to West Gate;
• South Gate Lete, from West Gate to St Mildred’s
Church, and then to Woulforin’s Lane, in St Peter’s;
• North Gate lete contained all the other parts of
the town, with the suburbs beyond Stoke Bridge and St. Clement’s Street.
Archaeological
finds From recent excavations made for
building purposes in the town objects of considerable interest and
antiquity have turned up. When the new bank was in progress on the
Cornhill, at a considerable depth were discovered two Roman vessels,
thus placing the history of the town upon the same date as the villa at
Whitton.
One is a Gutturnium or water-jug or
ewer, employed especially for pouring water over the hands before and
after meals. It appears that after it got into disuse as an ewer it
served the purpose of a cinerary urn, as it bears blackened marks from
the fires of the Pyra, or Rogus, when the calcined bones were
further
cremated.
The other vessel is of great rarity
and interest. It is an adult Tetina,
or feeding bottle. It much
resembles the Ampula, as it
is finished with a tubular spout at the
side. This, unfortunately, much mutilated. Many other fragments were
also discovered, and with the a patina, or patera, composed of Salopian
paste and standing on small feet.
H. WATLING Derby Villas, Pearce Road.'
Of course, historical and archeological researches since 1882 will have
refined our picture of the town's defences, but the reference to the
western arm of the rampart reaching down to the river was new
information to us. We had always assumed that the extensive and almost
impassable marshes to the south-west of the Middle Saxon town were
defence enough against invaders, with the river providing a
natural defence to the south.
The first defensive ditch-and-bank Robert Malster in A History of Ipswich
(see Reading List) tells us:-
'It was during the Danish occupation that the first town defences were
formed. The digging of a roughly circular ditch and bank around the
town led to a distortion of the original street layout; for one thing,
the ditch cut across the original line
of Fore Street [see map] which had led straight into the town before
being diverted to join the
present line of Lower/Upper Orwell Street, presumably entering the town
via the East Gate. Beginning at the edge of the marsh on the western
side of the settlement, the ditch and bank ran around almost the whole
of the populated area, finishing close to the river on the east side,
with the river and marsh providing a defence to the south and the
south-west.
'These defences were presumably set up in response to the advance of
the army of Wessex early in the 10th century, but it is believed that
they were never used for defensive purposes; the East Anglian Danes
capitulated in 918 after Edward the Elder had occupied Colchester. What
is perhaps surprising in view of the troubled times in which the
Wuffinga dynasty ruled is that Gipeswic apparently had no earlier
defences.
'The sequence of defences is obscure, but it is known that the ditch
was at one stage filled in and that it was then redug some time in the
11th century. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle tells us that in 991 the
Vikings (which is just another way of describing the Danes) 'harried'
Ipswich before marching south to win the epic battle of Maldon in which
Byrhmoth and his Essex thegns were killed. Then in 1010 a Viking army
under Thurkill the Tall sailed up the Orwell and landed at Ipswich,
from where they marched west to the great battle at Ringmere, between
Bury St Edmunds and Thetford.
'Did the marauding armies put the residents of Gipswic to the sword?
Did they burn the town after plundering the storehouses and workshops?
We simply do not know; it is uncertain what the writer of the
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle meant when he wrote of the town being 'harried'.
Archaeologists have found burnt buildings, and they have found bodies
apparently hurriedly buried close to domestic buildings, but there is
no evidence to show that the conflagration was the result of accidental
overturning of a candle or of torching by invaders, and little is known
about those bodies. ...
[1203] 'Three years
after obtaining the charter the town reconstructed the town rampart and
ditch on the line of the Danish-period ditch, and in 1299 a grant
of murage was obtained from the Crown entitling the town authorities to
raise money for the repair of the defences. So it was that
in 1302 it is recorded that a "parcell of the Town Ditches [was]
granted to Robert Joyliffe, at the yearly rent of sixpence forever;
unless it comes to pass that the town shall be enclosed by a stone
wall". In 1352 a licence was indeed obtained to strengthen the town
with a stone wall, but while excavation evidence suggests a foundation
trench might have been dug for this wall it was never built, though
town gates were erected at points where important roads entered the
circuit of the ramparts, the last of them surviving until the 18th
century. It is true that there are references in the town archives to
"walls", but an order of 1604 makes it clear that the word is being
used to describe the earthen bank and not a stone wall.' The map detail from Speed, 1610 shows
the modern street names in blue. This detail clearly shows how Fore
Street, approachingthe early 'town centre' (i.e. the area
round the northern quays) from the east, bends sharply through ninety degrees to go
north to meet Lower/Upper Orwell Streets to avoid the rampart and ditch
down Lower Orwell Street, which must have reached down to the river.
Stephen Alsford's excellent 'History
of medieval Ipswich' website (see Links):- 'Line of the ditch/wall
The line (which I have indicated by a brown overlay on Speed's map***)
was clearly suggested in the topography of the streets into the 19th
century (although less so with late 20th-century redevelopment),
including street names like Tower Ditches and St. Margaret Ditches.
According to a note in one of the Ipswich Domesday Books, the ditches
were dug in 1203; but this does not rule out the effort simply being an
enlargement or extension of an earlier line of defence. There are
fairly frequent references to grants of parcels of the town ditch,
particular along the northern boundary, where they are sometimes
referred to as the "great ditches of the town". Walls are far less
commonly mentioned and their extent is uncertain. In 1302 a burgess was
granted a lease of part of the ditches, for 6d. a year, to be voided if
the town were ever enclosed by a wall. We hear of town wall in St.
Margaret's parish in a grant of 1315, and in St. Mary Elms parish in
1323. A change had occurred between the compilation of a custumal in
1291 and its translation into English in the fifteenth century, since
the former refers to a watercourse called "Botflood" (the flooded town
ditch?) passing along the side of a road, while the latter refers to it
running alongside the wall. What wall-building there was may have
focused on areas where the ditches were weakest and may never have
proceeded to creation of a continuous line; the eastern and western
sides of the borough clearly had walls, but it is less certain that the
northern perimeter did.'
[*** Alsford's brown line indicating the rampart starts at the southern
end of Lower Orwell Street – not reaching the river dock – runs
northwards into Upper Orwell Street across Majors Corner and a small
portion of St Helens Street. From there it continues onto St Margarets
Street and Crown Street, across St Matthews Street/Westgate Street into
Lady Lane. The last coloured section is Tanners Lane (now under Civic
Drive) and finishes where it, Friars Street and Greyfriars Road meet.
It does not continue further to the river.]